The long-awaited Balvenie Tun 1401 article is finally here! I feel like I’ve been preparing my entire whisky-related existence for this post. I truly hope you enjoy the result of years of dedication to a whisky that deserves to be celebrated.
Intro
I was first exposed to Tun 1401 in 2011 when Batch 3 (the first US batch) was released. I knew that the series was starting to gain some traction and knew that it had some really old casks in it but didn’t know much else.
I can still remember exactly where I was when I tried Batch 3. My wife and I were sitting on the couch in our first house one unsuspecting evening. I took one sip amidst a conversation and it quite literally stopped me in my tracks. I looked straight at my wife and said, “I think I’m drinking the best whisky I’ll ever have.”
From then on, I knew that I had to try more. I was able to get the other US-based batches (6 and 9) fairly easily and I grabbed a Batch 7 on the way home from a Canada trip. My friend in the UK had a line on Batch 8 for me. At one point, I narrowly missed an opportunity to get my hands on some Batch 4. Eventually I got Batch 5 at an above-retail price. As for the batches I couldn’t track down/afford, a good whisky friend named Sloane helped me acquire samples of the early batches I didn’t have on hand. Thank you! I couldn’t have done this without you!
What’s so special about Tun 1401?
Why Tun 1401? The short answer to that question is because it’s really old, really good whisky that was sold at an incredible price.
Every batch of Tun 1401 is comprised of anywhere from 6-14 casks. That’s it. There’s no filler whisky in these bottles. The capacity of the Tun itself was about 2000 liters so that meant a full batch only ever amounted to 2500-3000 bottles max. These ultra-micro batches are truly a whisky nerd’s dream.
There’s a cool YouTube video by The Balvenie showing the unsurprisingly-old school process of filling the Tun with with the casks that eventually became Batch 3.
Every single batch consists of casks that are 35-45 years old with a single 21 or 22 year old cask added to each batch to bring the strength up. Through years of research, I’ve compiled what I believe to be the most comprehensive worksheet on the Tun 1401 series outside of the distillery itself. Below is a sample of some of the data I’ve collected on each batch. Some of this data is unconfirmed but I’ve made some well-educated guesses that I’m fairly confident about. Let’s take a look at the details.
Batch | Bottled | Strength | Bottles | Oldest Cask | Youngest Cask | Average Age | Sherry % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2010 | 48.1% | 336 | 44 | 22 | 35 | 48% |
2 | 2011 | 50.6% | 2226 | 44 | 22 | 37 | 52% |
3 | 2011 | 50.3% | 1800 | 44 | 22 | 37 | 52% |
4 | 2012 | 50.4% | 2500 | 46 | 22 | 37 | 52% |
5 | 2012 | 50.1% | 2862 | 46 | 21 | 38 | 67% |
6 | 2012 | 49.8% | 2500 | 43* | 21* | 38 | 42% |
7 | 2013 | 49.2% | 2500* | 43 | 22 | 39 | 36% |
8 | 2013 | 50.2% | 2700 | 43 | 22 | 37 | 45% |
9 | 2013 | 49.3% | 2500* | 43* | 21* | 38 | 41% |
* Educated Guess
While the batch information is certainly important, this range is all about the casks themselves. Let’s take a look at the data I’ve collected about the individual batches in more detail. Here’s a sample of cask information I have on Batch 8, one of my favorite batches in the series.
Order | Cask No. | Type | Size | Year | Age |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 15917 | Bourbon | Hogshead | 1970 | 43 |
2 | 14827 | Bourbon | Hogshead | 1972 | 41 |
3 | 7049 | Bourbon | Hogshead | 1973 | 40 |
4 | 15338 | Bourbon | Hogshead | 1975 | 38 |
5 | 6333 | Bourbon | Hogshead | 1976 | 37 |
6 | 5825 | Bourbon | Hogshead | 1978 | 35 |
7 | 1636 | Bourbon | Hogshead | 1981 | 32 |
8 | 887 | Bourbon | Hogshead | 1982 | 31 |
9 | 486 | Bourbon | Hogshead | 1991 | 22 |
10 | 12614 | Sherry | Butt | 1970 | 43 |
11 | 13128 | Sherry | Butt | 1971 | 42 |
12 | 8587 | Sherry | Butt | 1973 | 40 |
See what I’m saying? Some incredible whisky went into this release.
What about the price? Let’s explore 30 and 40 year old Balvenie today. The 30 Year official release retails for around $1,000 in the US while the 40 year hovers around the $5,000 mark. Those big age statements command a huge asking price. These Tun 1401 barrels sold as single casks would likely retail for $20,000-$30,000 each in today’s market.
Because of the younger barrel added to each batch, Tun 1401 never carried an age statement but I always tell people you could causally call these releases “35ish year old whisky”. Tun 1401 batches retailed for $249 in the US and I often found bottles for under that retail price on shelves. I only ever paid over retail price for Batch 5 which was unattainable for me without going through international channels.
The range was discontinued in 2014 in favor of Tun 1509, a marrying vessel with four times the capacity of Tun 1401. I created this image soon after to express my true sorrow.
Blind Tasting The Entire Range
The idea to blind taste the entire range at once was a project almost two years in the making. A good portion of that time involved tracking down all nine batches and included a full, year-long tasting ban of any Tun 1401 to reset my palate. I also decided to add in the 2010 release of Balvenie 30 Year to see how it stacked up against Tun 1401. Once the samples were ready, I needed to find a time when my brother and I could taste through ten half-oz samples in one lengthy sitting. That day finally came one December afternoon.
We tasted these samples five at a time in two back-to-back sessions over the course of an afternoon. There were no distractions and we didn’t discuss our notes or impressions of what we were drinking until the tasting was over. If you’d like to play along, I’ve hidden the reveal of each sample so you can try and guess which pour is which. I also decided not to include ratings or scores here. This is my favorite whiskey of all time so including a bunch of 97s, 98s, and 99s out of 100 isn’t particularly insightful in my opinion.
With that, here are the results of the only blind tasting ever done on the entire Balvenie Tun 1401 range.

Tasting Notes
Category | Notes |
---|---|
Appearance | Amber |
Nose | Honey, vanilla, old wood and oil, leather, orange peel, chocolate, maple syrup. Quite floral after time, honeycomb, pear |
Taste | OAK, fruitcake, vanilla, very sweet, citrus, fresh whipped cream, nutmeg, caramel apples, big cinnamon |
Finish | Long, spicy, oak, caramel, tons of wood at the end, hints of tropical fruits |
Overall Thoughts | I think this is a less sherried batch. Lots of citrus in this one. VERY complex and evolved the most over time of all 10 samples. |
My Guess | Batch 7 |
Reveal |
Spoiler
Batch 6 [collapse]
|
Category | Notes |
---|---|
Appearance | Dark reddish amber |
Nose | Big oak, anise, caramel, cacao, malty, spicy, musty basement, old library books, raisin and other dried fruits |
Taste | Incredible oak and spice, cinnamon, vanilla, honey, cigar box, apricot, more oak, lemon zest, the spiciest batch of A-E |
Finish | Dry, honey covered wood, maple sap, cherries, vanilla, hint of sherry influence at the end. |
Overall Thoughts | I'm pretty sure I've had this before. And it's good. |
My Guess | Batch 5 |
Reveal |
Spoiler
Batch 8 [collapse]
|
Category | Notes |
---|---|
Appearance | Dark Amber |
Nose | Sherry up front, chocolate covered cherries, citrus, oak, vanilla, honey, hint of fennel |
Taste | Sherry spiciness, Christmas spice, almond, reminds me of a port finish, cereal, wood, vanilla, milk chocolate |
Finish | Lots of spice, and THERE'S that big oak! Lots of bourbony vanilla, hint of fresh mint |
Overall Thoughts | The most sherry-forward so far. The least house-styled in my opinion. "One of these is not like the others." |
My Guess | Batch 6 |
Reveal |
Spoiler
Batch 7 [collapse]
|
Category | Notes |
---|---|
Appearance | Dark Amber |
Nose | Oak in front, vanilla, nutmeg, toasted almond, stewed apples, honeyed sweetness |
Taste | Oaky and sharp, vanilla, more stewed fruits, chocolate orange candy, almost sour at times, classic Balvenie if you ask me. |
Finish | Excellent house finish, a huge blast of honey and vanilla. |
Overall Thoughts | This is almost a nostalgic batch. Reminds me a lot of the single barrel releases, especially the Single Barrel 25. |
My Guess | 30 Year |
Reveal |
Spoiler
Batch 9 [collapse]
|
Category | Notes |
---|---|
Appearance | Dark Red/Copper |
Nose | A dark, dank, old library, leather couches, prunes, tobacco, old oak, hot fudge sundae |
Taste | Crazy old wood. Like, the woodiest thing ever. Times infinity. Big creamy, vanilla, musty, spicy, almost burnt caramel. Citrus emerges eventually, some allspice as well. |
Finish | More oak, earthy, lost of spice, chocolate bordering on cappuccino, hint of pepper. |
Overall Thoughts | The woodiest whisky I've had. The best of A-E (slightly better than B) |
My Guess | Batch 7 |
Reveal |
Spoiler
Batch 5 [collapse]
|
Category | Notes |
---|---|
Appearance | Amber |
Nose | Honey and sherry, heavy oak, cigar box, spicy. |
Taste | Lost of sherry and spice, oaky, vanilla, apples, cinnamon, sugary sweet this time. Smells like a lumber yard. |
Finish | Lots of honey, sherry, vanilla, and oak. Repeat. |
Overall Thoughts | Sticks to the house style with more sherry influence. Not as good as D. |
My Guess | Batch 8 |
Reveal |
Spoiler
Batch 2 [collapse]
|
Category | Notes |
---|---|
Appearance | Dark Amber |
Nose | Back to dark and musty. Leather-bound book, maple, oaky, dried fruits, a bit spicy. Surprisingly floral for the "dark style". |
Taste | Big oak, leathery, lots of vanilla, honey, a hint of citrus, malty. |
Finish | A (relatively) subdued finish. Woody, old, spicy. A bit of anise in the back. |
Overall Thoughts | In the same dark vein as B and E but not as good as either. Disappointing finish. |
My Guess | Batch 2 |
Reveal |
Spoiler
Batch 4 [collapse]
|
Category | Notes |
---|---|
Appearance | Amber |
Nose | Spice up front with oak following. Nutmeg, clove, raisins, dried cherries, oak, vanilla. Oak takes a back seat to spice for once. |
Taste | More spice, pumpkin pie style spice here, cinnamon, oak, vanilla, sherry, dried cherries. |
Finish | Guess what? More spice, vanilla, mulling spices, sherry. |
Overall Thoughts | I'm going to go out on a limb and say that this is the spiciest of the bunch. Needs better balance. |
My Guess | Batch 9 |
Reveal |
Spoiler
Batch 1 [collapse]
|
Category | Notes |
---|---|
Appearance | Amber |
Nose | Honey and vanilla (house style alert!), oaky, bourbony, chocolate, bready/doughy |
Taste | Big honey sweetness, oak, vanilla, lots of spice, pencil shavings, overripe bananas. |
Finish | Typical Balvenie finish. Tons of honey, spice, hint of coconut, citrus. |
Overall Thoughts | Another house style-centered sample. Exactly as good as D. |
My Guess | Batch 4 |
Reveal |
Spoiler
30 Year [collapse]
|
Category | Notes |
---|---|
Appearance | Dark Amber |
Nose | Dark and musty like a basement, dark dried fruit, figs and prunes, tobacco. Jesus… |
Taste | Leathery, cigar box, aromatic, botanicals, prunes, the age is VERY apparent, some honey in the back |
Finish | Big tobacco, leather, earthy, fennel, vanilla, oak in the back. |
Overall Thoughts | The darkest of them all. Almost TOO dark. Almost. Sometimes reminded me of an ACID cigar. I like B and E better. |
My Guess | Batch 1 |
Reveal |
Spoiler
Batch 3 [collapse]
|

Results
As it turns out, I seem to gravitate toward the more heavily sherried releases in Batches 5 and 8. These batches were also UK market batches. They saved the really good stuff for themselves it seems. I was also surprised to learn that the incredibly rare and expensive Batch 1 was not even in my top five.
Batch 3 had a tough slot in the lineup. I wonder if my palate was too fatigued to be able to properly evaluate this heavy hitting batch after nine other samples. I had some Batch 3 recently and was once again blown away by it. I’d be really curious to see how this experiment would have played out in a different order.
Adding the 30 Year into the lineup proved to be quite interesting. I found the 30 to be extremely similar to Batch 9. At the time of its release, Batch 9 was retailing for about 25%-35% of the cost of the 30 Year.
My brother and I didn’t totally agree on our rankings but we both had batches 5, 6, and 8 in our top five and both had batches 1 and 7 in our bottom three.
This probably goes without saying, but if you ever get the opportunity to try this amazing whisky, I would HIGHLY recommend it.
17 comments
Will this be available in Canada?
Hi Raymond. Unfortunately, the entire series was discontinued in 2014. Tun 1509 is the successor to the 1401 range and is available worldwide.
Hi Chris (?), what a amazing story. Congratulations for it. I’m a Balvenie lover as well and I’m looking for details about the different bottlings for quite a lot of years. Please let me add something to your story.
Not many people know (exept some distillery visitors) that the batch 10 was still in the TUN 1401 for marrying and you could take a nose of it during the tour. Then Balvenie decided not to release this batch. Why? I don’t know ! Perhaps the TUN 1401 was broken (the years later it was gone!) or the sales dept. has had different ideas …
There is a rumor: The whisky of TUN 1401 Batch 10 was filled into TUN 1858 and then later released in batch 3 of this Taiwan only bottling.
Hi Olaf, thanks for the kind words. There was absolutely a 10th batch maturing in Tun 1401 when the series was discontinued. While there has never been any official confirmation about what happened to it, I have it on good authority that it is indeed Tun 1858 Batch 3. I can’t explain why they made the decision to do this but it’s nice to know that it made it to market somewhere!
Wow, loved all of this guide/review. Honest, informative, entertaining. I purchased as many of the US releases I could find back in the day when they were available but have only downed one bottle of batch 9 so far. I bought these to enjoy in my retirement years which just happened. I am the proud owner of a total of 30 bottles of batch 3, 6, and 9 to make love too now. Lucky me…..Thanks again Chris.
Mike, thanks for the kind words. 30 bottles is truly incredible. While I have a bunch left, I don’t nearly have the same number of 1401s that you do. I’m glad you had the foresight to stock up when you did. Happy retirement and please ENJOY these wonderful releases!
Great story of discovery. My experience with the batch #3 was very similar. It blew me away upon first wiff. After the first dram I knew it was a very special whisky and the next day I ran out and bought a case. Still have a few left. Magical stuff.
I love hearing things like this. This bottle has no equivalent when it was released and those of us that stocked up back then got the steal of the century!
A great informative story here, thanks!
And now the asking price for total 1858 whole(1~7) batches in Taiwan where I live is about 8,200.-USD.
I wonder what would be the appropriate price for 1401 1~9 batches.
-Ting
Thanks for reading! I’ve seen the whole set of 1401 batches 1-9 sell for over $15,000.
Great reviews of the balvenie tun 1401. I have an unopened bottle of the batch 5 which is well beyond my normal low value whiskey palate. For this reason I am saving for the right time to sell!! Really good review, I learnt a lot!!
Thank you, Graham. Batch 5 is my favorite of the entire series so you certainly have a great bottle on your hands. I always recommend opening and enjoying special bottles like this but if you decide to sell it, you’ll make a decent return on your initial investment. Cheers!
Thanks Chris….I think as an investment it’s been the best one I have had…I won this bottle in a free spot the ball competition…I’ve had worse days…lol
I had never heard of a spot the ball competition before and just looked up what it is. Very interesting way to win a great bottle!
Yeah, I won it on a website….www.maltwhiskies.com…
Worth a look…the chaps on there know their whiskey stuff….guy called Paul was the one I dealt with early in their conception…monthly comps for rare bottles!!
You sir, are a God. Thank you for this!
Had the identical reaction as you upon first tasting this whisky. I won’t even reveal the batch number, because these are all exceedingly rare now and I already worry about a “Pappy van Winkle” syndrome….
Slàinte!
I wouldn’t worry too much about Pappy syndrome with Tun 1401. There are very limited quantities of this series left and most batches haven’t been available for a decade. The series goes largely unnoticed by the whisky market at large these days. I’m glad you got to try it though!